WEEK
SEVEN
MANUMISSION
AND FREEDMEN AT
MANUMISSION
AT
Sources: Wiedemann Sourcebook ch. 3 and Gardner/Wiedemann, Roman Household ch.
7.
[Demosthenes], Oration 59 Against Neaira (translation by C. Carey in Aris and Phillips
edition (1992), or in Trials from Classical
Athens (1997) [electronic copy available via library “digital
readings” list]; also available in the Loeb, and Oratory of Classical Greece
series); good extended treatment/discussion in Hamel 2003; see now also Henry
2006
Athens: EVERYONE to read and MAKE NOTES on Against Neaira, and be prepared to talk about it in class,
for the light it throws on Athenian attitudes to male/female, slave/free,
citizen/metic and anything else relating to law and society that you can think
of! What problems are there in
interpreting the speech, given its genre and context? Who wrote it and who delivered it? What does it set out to prove, and is it
successful in its aim?
Bibliography:
On Freedmen in general with comparative focus,
see essays in Kleijwegt 2006.
Bradley 1987 ch. 3 and 1994 ch. 8
For law, check Watson 1987 (cf. Watson 1967 chs. 16-19) or Buckland
1908;
Hopkins 1978 chs. 2-3; Wiedemann
1985; Kleijwegt 2009
Weaver 1986, 1990, 1991, 1997
Gardner 1993 ch. 2; also 1991
Duff 1928 (early empire, now rather dated); Treggiari 1969 (late
republic)
Lopez de Quiroga 1998
Zelnick-Abramovitz 2005 and 2009; Todd 1993;
McLean 2002 ch. 12; Tod 1901/2
Paramone agreements: Wiedemann nos. 23-7; Horsley/Kearsley 1997
(Roman imperial example); see
Trevett 1992 ch. 1 (Pasion), Cohen 1992
MacDowell 1978 pp. 82-3
Whitehead 1977, esp. 114-16 (and manumission in index)
Hunter and Edmondson 2000, especially Hunter ch. 1 and Osborne ch. 4
Jewish manumission material:
Gibson 1999; Levinskaya 1996 Appendix 3; Hezser 2005